Reviews for "Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 7.3
weeks
10.6
weeks
n/a 2 1
(bad)
0
(very bad)
Rejected
Motivation: The manuscript was rejected because one reviewer was not satisfied with a minor comment not fully addressed in his/her opinion. The two other reviewers fully supported the publication. The editor (Dr. Molinari) seemed not to fully understand the paper and did not intervene.
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 10.7
weeks
10.7
weeks
n/a 1 1
(bad)
1
(bad)
Rejected
Motivation: After 2 months and 10 days of wait, we received the reject notification from the editor, motivated by meagre and minimal review. The reviewer stated our dataset was too small, and recommended to turn down the article.
I agree that the dataset was small, but that's not a good reason to reject an article in my opinion.
It looked like the reviewer was unable to assess the scientific relevance of our study results.
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 6.9
weeks
16.3
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Motivation: Very good review reports
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine n/a n/a 15.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Motivation: I missed more information on the actual reason for its rejection, but I appreciate promptly providing this information to allow submitting the manuscript to another journal without delaying too much publication times