Reviews for "Computational Statistics and Data Analysis"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Computational Statistics and Data Analysis n/a n/a 15.0
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Motivation: An AE wrote a summary of the paper missing the main point and rejected it.
Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 11.3
n/a 2 2
(very bad)
Motivation: The first time the AE comlpetely missed the novelties.
then i was assigned a reviewer who hardly wrote in English and asked generic questions (e.g. I wonder if the two methods are different, of course they were) or would just not understand and ask for clarifications.
In the three rounds of reviewing one referee never acknowledged I had answered his/er previous comments, but would just come up with new meaningless requests.
I found it totally unethical to let a referee just argue for the sake of not making a paper published. The other referee said it was ok after the second review.