Reviews for "Computational Materials Science"

Average duration			Review reports (1^st review rnd.)
1^st rev. rnd	Tot. handling	Im. rejection	Number	Quality	Overall rating	Outcome	Year
5.6 weeks	5.9 weeks	n/a	1	3 (good)	3 (good)	Accepted	2020
Motivation: Very fast handling and review process. The review was not that tough. The manuscript remained roughly same after the revision.
6.5 weeks	7.9 weeks	n/a	2	4 (very good)	1 (bad)	Accepted	2019
Motivation: The review process was fine. But the proof stage was very poorly done. They used an automated paginator and I had to make all the changes myself. The tool was not able to make some changes, requiring comments to be added that were not addressed by the publisher. They then tried to publish the article without making some of the requested changes. The changes were eventually made after much effort in contacting the publisher. The editor and reviewers were great though.
n/a	n/a	3.0 days	n/a	n/a	n/a	Rejected (im.)	2016
n/a	n/a	9.0 days	n/a	n/a	n/a	Rejected (im.)	2016
10.1 weeks	12.1 weeks	n/a	3	4 (very good)	4 (very good)	Accepted	2012