Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
5.6 weeks
5.9 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Accepted
2020
Motivation:
Very fast handling and review process. The review was not that tough. The manuscript remained roughly same after the revision.
6.5 weeks
7.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2019
Motivation:
The review process was fine. But the proof stage was very poorly done. They used an automated paginator and I had to make all the changes myself. The tool was not able to make some changes, requiring comments to be added that were not addressed by the publisher. They then tried to publish the article without making some of the requested changes. The changes were eventually made after much effort in contacting the publisher.
The editor and reviewers were great though.
The editor and reviewers were great though.
n/a
n/a
3 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2016
n/a
n/a
9 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2016
10.1 weeks
12.1 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2012