Reviews for "Computational Materials Science"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Computational Materials Science 5.6
weeks
5.9
weeks
n/a 1 3
(good)
3
(good)
Accepted
Motivation: Very fast handling and review process. The review was not that tough. The manuscript remained roughly same after the revision.
Computational Materials Science 6.5
weeks
7.9
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
1
(bad)
Accepted
Motivation: The review process was fine. But the proof stage was very poorly done. They used an automated paginator and I had to make all the changes myself. The tool was not able to make some changes, requiring comments to be added that were not addressed by the publisher. They then tried to publish the article without making some of the requested changes. The changes were eventually made after much effort in contacting the publisher.

The editor and reviewers were great though.
Computational Materials Science n/a n/a 3.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Computational Materials Science n/a n/a 9.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Computational Materials Science 10.1
weeks
12.1
weeks
n/a 3 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted