Reviews for "Computational Materials Science"

Journal title	Average duration			Review reports (1^st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page)	1^st rev. rnd	Tot. handling	Im. rejection	Number	Quality	Overall rating	Outcome
Computational Materials Science	5.6 weeks	5.9 weeks	n/a	1	3 (good)	3 (good)	Accepted
Computational Materials Science	Motivation: Very fast handling and review process. The review was not that tough. The manuscript remained roughly same after the revision.
Computational Materials Science	6.5 weeks	7.9 weeks	n/a	2	4 (very good)	1 (bad)	Accepted
Computational Materials Science	Motivation: The review process was fine. But the proof stage was very poorly done. They used an automated paginator and I had to make all the changes myself. The tool was not able to make some changes, requiring comments to be added that were not addressed by the publisher. They then tried to publish the article without making some of the requested changes. The changes were eventually made after much effort in contacting the publisher. The editor and reviewers were great though.
Computational Materials Science	n/a	n/a	3.0 days	n/a	n/a	n/a	Rejected (im.)
Computational Materials Science	n/a	n/a	9.0 days	n/a	n/a	n/a	Rejected (im.)
Computational Materials Science	10.1 weeks	12.1 weeks	n/a	3	4 (very good)	4 (very good)	Accepted