Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
Drawn back before first editorial decision after 60.8 days
Drawn back
2020
n/a
n/a
27 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2022
Motivation:
Clear evidence of an editorial review, lack of space as the main reason, plus a sentence of feedback (which is more than what we get from most desk rejections)
n/a
n/a
33 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2019
Motivation:
They say the article is interesting and well-crafted but too narrow. I do not fault their decision, but it strikes me as having taken too long to be communicated to me.
n/a
n/a
7 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2017
Motivation:
Anonymous review by two members of the editorial board, received a paragraph of justification and suggestion of where to submit the paper next.
26.0 weeks
26.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2015
Motivation:
Slow, editor comments suggested cursory reading of reviewers.
21.1 weeks
21.1 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Rejected
2016
Motivation:
Hard to beat insufficient enthusiasm. The reviewers suggested ways to take the manuscript into different directions, but nothing wrong with it.
13.0 weeks
13.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2013
Motivation:
One reviewer recommended acceptance, the other one was lukewarm but seems to have reviewed the paper in a real hurry.
11.7 weeks
11.7 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Rejected
2013
Motivation:
decent reviews, overall duration acceptable