Reviews for "Comparative Political Studies"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Comparative Political Studies n/a n/a 33.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Motivation: They say the article is interesting and well-crafted but too narrow. I do not fault their decision, but it strikes me as having taken too long to be communicated to me.
Comparative Political Studies n/a n/a 7.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Motivation: Anonymous review by two members of the editorial board, received a paragraph of justification and suggestion of where to submit the paper next.
Comparative Political Studies 26.0
weeks
26.0
weeks
n/a 2 0
(very bad)
1
(bad)
Rejected
Motivation: Slow, editor comments suggested cursory reading of reviewers.
Comparative Political Studies 21.1
weeks
21.1
weeks
n/a 3 3
(good)
3
(good)
Rejected
Motivation: Hard to beat insufficient enthusiasm. The reviewers suggested ways to take the manuscript into different directions, but nothing wrong with it.
Comparative Political Studies 13.0
weeks
13.0
weeks
n/a 2 2
(moderate)
3
(good)
Rejected
Motivation: One reviewer recommended acceptance, the other one was lukewarm but seems to have reviewed the paper in a real hurry.
Comparative Political Studies 11.7
weeks
11.7
weeks
n/a 1 3
(good)
4
(very good)
Rejected
Motivation: decent reviews, overall duration acceptable