Reviews for "Communications Psychology"

Motivation: Wait times were reasonable, reviewers understood the the literature and had different sets of relevant expertise, and the vast majority of reviewer comments were fair and reasonable questions to pose. The manuscript has certaintly been improved following their input.

Motivation: The review process was timely and the reviewers' comments were thorough and significantly contributed to improving the manuscript. We are very happy with how the manuscript was handled by the journal's editor and impressed with the quality of the reviews.