Reviews for "Communications in Mathematical Physics"

Review this journal Show journal page
Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome Year
Communications in Mathematical Physics 14.1
weeks		 14.7
weeks		 n/a 1 5
(excellent)		 5
(excellent)		 Accepted 2020
Motivation: Every stage of the review process was very professional and author-friendly. The perfect rating is to highlight the excellent choice of anonymous referee by the editor. The referee was extremely diligent, as obvious by the in-depth and to the point comments and suggestions. This was by far the best referee report I have ever received in comparison to other journals in the field and it greatly improved the quality of the paper.
Communications in Mathematical Physics 21.7
weeks		 47.4
weeks		 n/a 2 4
(very good)		 3
(good)		 Accepted 2019
Communications in Mathematical Physics n/a n/a 40.0
days		 n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2016
Communications in Mathematical Physics n/a n/a 29.0
days		 n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2016
Motivation: Quick response from the editor that the manuscript does not necessarily fit the scope of that journal.
Communications in Mathematical Physics n/a n/a 14.0
days		 n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2015
Motivation: Editor in Chief Horng-Tzer Yau said "I regret to inform you that this topic is not of direct interest to CMP's intended audience. Your paper is more suitable to an applied math or applied physics journal. Mathematical physics is a vast field, and while we have tried to extend our coverage as much as possible, our scope is limited by the editorial board member's particular domains of interest. CMP has a substantial backlog of accepted papers. In an effort to reduce the backlog, we unfortunately cannot accept all of the good works that are submitted. We therefore cannot accept this article for publication."
Communications in Mathematical Physics 9.7
weeks		 9.7
weeks		 n/a 0 n/a 0
(very bad)		 Rejected 2015
Communications in Mathematical Physics 17.4
weeks		 18.4
weeks		 n/a 1 4
(very good)		 4
(very good)		 Accepted 2014
Communications in Mathematical Physics 13.0
weeks		 17.4
weeks		 n/a 1 4
(very good)		 4
(very good)		 Accepted 2012
Communications in Mathematical Physics 10.0
weeks		 10.0
weeks		 n/a 1 4
(very good)		 4
(very good)		 Accepted 2014
Communications in Mathematical Physics n/a n/a 121.6
days		 n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2012
Motivation: After 4 months I wrote to the Editorial Office and they immediately reply that
You paper is still under review, but I will contact the editor in case there is need of reminders.