Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
n/a
n/a
91 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2022
Motivation:
The editorial board's assessment and informal consultations with experts took 3 months. Rejected without any report.
n/a
n/a
14 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2024
23.1 weeks
26.7 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2024
Motivation:
smooth and fast process with high-quality reports
n/a
n/a
199 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2022
Motivation:
Very long wait for a desk rejection. Repeatedly asked about status to no avail.
n/a
n/a
99 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2022
Motivation:
I regret to inform you that this topic is not of direct interest to CMP's intended audience. Mathematical physics is a vast field, and while we have tried to extend our coverage as much as possible, our scope is limited by the editorial board member's particular domains of interest. CMP has a substantial backlog of accepted papers. We are therefore forced to impose very strict standards. In particular, we need to select papers that are more in line with the core areas that are considered to be within the traditional scope of CMP. In an effort to reduce the backlog, we unfortunately cannot accept all of the good works that are submitted.
n/a
n/a
9 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2021
20.0 weeks
31.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2021
Motivation:
Very great journal, and very great submission experience
n/a
n/a
45 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2020
14.1 weeks
14.7 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Accepted
2020
Motivation:
Every stage of the review process was very professional and author-friendly. The perfect rating is to highlight the excellent choice of anonymous referee by the editor. The referee was extremely diligent, as obvious by the in-depth and to the point comments and suggestions. This was by far the best referee report I have ever received in comparison to other journals in the field and it greatly improved the quality of the paper.
21.7 weeks
47.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2019
n/a
n/a
40 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2016
n/a
n/a
29 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2016
Motivation:
Quick response from the editor that the manuscript does not necessarily fit the scope of that journal.
n/a
n/a
14 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2015
Motivation:
Editor in Chief Horng-Tzer Yau said "I regret to inform you that this topic is not of direct interest to CMP's intended audience. Your paper is more suitable to an applied math or applied physics journal. Mathematical physics is a vast field, and while we have tried to extend our coverage as much as possible, our scope is limited by the editorial board member's particular domains of interest. CMP has a substantial backlog of accepted papers. In an effort to reduce the backlog, we unfortunately cannot accept all of the good works that are submitted. We therefore cannot accept this article for publication."
9.7 weeks
9.7 weeks
n/a
0 reports
n/a
Rejected
2015
17.4 weeks
18.4 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Accepted
2014
13.0 weeks
17.4 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Accepted
2012
10.0 weeks
10.0 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Accepted
2014
n/a
n/a
121 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2012
Motivation:
After 4 months I wrote to the Editorial Office and they immediately reply that
You paper is still under review, but I will contact the editor in case there is need of reminders.
You paper is still under review, but I will contact the editor in case there is need of reminders.