Reviews for "Communications in Mathematical Physics"
| Journal title | Average duration | Review reports (1st review rnd.) |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (click to go to journal page) | 1st rev. rnd | Tot. handling | Im. rejection | Number | Quality | Overall rating | Outcome |
| Communications in Mathematical Physics | 21.7 weeks |
47.4 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 4 (very good) |
3 (good) |
Accepted |
| Communications in Mathematical Physics | n/a | n/a | 40.0 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) |
| Communications in Mathematical Physics | n/a | n/a | 29.0 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) |
| Motivation: Quick response from the editor that the manuscript does not necessarily fit the scope of that journal. | |||||||
| Communications in Mathematical Physics | n/a | n/a | 14.0 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) |
| Motivation: Editor in Chief Horng-Tzer Yau said "I regret to inform you that this topic is not of direct interest to CMP's intended audience. Your paper is more suitable to an applied math or applied physics journal. Mathematical physics is a vast field, and while we have tried to extend our coverage as much as possible, our scope is limited by the editorial board member's particular domains of interest. CMP has a substantial backlog of accepted papers. In an effort to reduce the backlog, we unfortunately cannot accept all of the good works that are submitted. We therefore cannot accept this article for publication." | |||||||
| Communications in Mathematical Physics | 9.7 weeks |
9.7 weeks |
n/a | 0 | n/a | 0 (very bad) |
Rejected |
| Communications in Mathematical Physics | 17.4 weeks |
18.4 weeks |
n/a | 1 | 4 (very good) |
4 (very good) |
Accepted |
| Communications in Mathematical Physics | 13.0 weeks |
17.4 weeks |
n/a | 1 | 4 (very good) |
4 (very good) |
Accepted |
| Communications in Mathematical Physics | 10.0 weeks |
10.0 weeks |
n/a | 1 | 4 (very good) |
4 (very good) |
Accepted |
| Communications in Mathematical Physics | n/a | n/a | 121.6 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) |
| Motivation: After 4 months I wrote to the Editorial Office and they immediately reply that You paper is still under review, but I will contact the editor in case there is need of reminders. |
|||||||
@scirev