Reviews for "Communications Biology"
| Journal title | Average duration | Review reports (1st review rnd.) |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (click to go to journal page) | 1st rev. rnd | Tot. handling | Im. rejection | Number | Quality | Overall rating | Outcome |
| Communications Biology | 5.0 weeks |
12.6 weeks |
n/a | 3 | 5 (excellent) |
4 (very good) |
Accepted |
| Communications Biology | 8.7 weeks |
13.4 weeks |
n/a | 3 | 4 (very good) |
5 (excellent) |
Accepted |
| Motivation: Unlike other nature journals, the publication process in Comms Bio was very smooth. Editors are very committed and efficient. | |||||||
| Communications Biology | 4.6 weeks |
11.3 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 3 (good) |
5 (excellent) |
Rejected |
| Motivation: Although there were some basic misunderstandings by the referees, it was finally rejected with reasonable basis. The editor was fair and author friendly. | |||||||
| Communications Biology | 5.7 weeks |
11.6 weeks |
n/a | 3 | 5 (excellent) |
5 (excellent) |
Accepted |
| Motivation: a perfect review experience, a fair editorial process, and an excellent journal | |||||||
@scirev