Reviews for "Cold Regions Science and Technology"

Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
6.5 weeks
7.1 weeks
n/a
3 reports
2
3
Accepted
2011
Motivation: Not all reviewers were familiar with an important aspect of the paper. Therefore it took quite an effort to explain them the background. However, there were also some comments, which led to an improvement of the paper. The review process was comparably fast.