Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
8.4 weeks
22.1 weeks
n/a
3 reports
5
3
Accepted
2019
Motivation: The quality of the reviewer comments was overall helpful, but the process took very long with several review rounds.
5.0 weeks
5.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
1
3
Rejected
2012
Motivation: The review process was rather fast as compared to other journals (2 reviews after about 5 weeks). The comments of one reviewer were very destructive and did not seem reasonable to me.