Reviews for "Climatic Change"
| Journal title | Average duration | Review reports (1st review rnd.) |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (click to go to journal page) | 1st rev. rnd | Tot. handling | Im. rejection | Number | Quality | Overall rating | Outcome | Year |
| Climatic Change | n/a | n/a | 40.0 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) | 2019 |
| Climatic Change | 13.6 weeks |
13.6 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 3 (good) |
4 (very good) |
Rejected | 2019 |
| Motivation: One of the referees was constructive, but the other was not. I think we could answer to the questions&comments of this critical reviewer, however the editors didn't offered an opportunity for revision. | ||||||||
| Climatic Change | 35.1 weeks |
43.4 weeks |
n/a | 3 | 4 (very good) |
3 (good) |
Accepted | 2019 |
| Motivation: Actually, we initially submitted this as a comment to an article previously published in the same journal, so there was a review prior to the first review shown here. We were generally pleased with the reviewers' comments and with higher level editors responsiveness. However, the reviews and the editorial handling of the reviews took too long. We had to repeatedly ask for updates. | ||||||||
| Climatic Change | 16.0 weeks |
23.9 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 4 (very good) |
4 (very good) |
Accepted | 2017 |
| Motivation: The first round of review was a bit slow because there was a mix-up in the system and the manuscript was wrongly marked as being in pre-production for the first few weeks after initial submission. This was rectified after upon contacting the editor after 4 weeks had elapsed. From that point on, the rest of the process was satisfactory and hitch-free. | ||||||||
| Climatic Change | n/a | n/a | 2.0 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) | 2017 |
| Motivation: Transparent, fast and comprehensible decision. Would definitely submit there again. | ||||||||
| Climatic Change | 34.7 weeks |
69.4 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 1 (bad) |
1 (bad) |
Accepted | 2013 |
| Motivation: The review required too much time! | ||||||||
| Climatic Change | 25.7 weeks |
38.7 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 4 (very good) |
4 (very good) |
Accepted | 2015 |
| Motivation: Fairly good review process, with acceptable time between submission and acceptance. | ||||||||
| Climatic Change | n/a | n/a | 41.0 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) | 2015 |
| Climatic Change | 21.9 weeks |
21.9 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 4 (very good) |
3 (good) |
Rejected | 2012 |
| Climatic Change | 16.4 weeks |
16.4 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 3 (good) |
3 (good) |
Rejected | 2012 |