Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
13.0 weeks
21.7 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2015
Motivation:
The reviewing time could have been shorter.
One of the reviewer was clearly not well-acquainted with my area of research, hence very bad review. Meanwhile the other reviewers provided very constructive feedback.
One of the reviewer was clearly not well-acquainted with my area of research, hence very bad review. Meanwhile the other reviewers provided very constructive feedback.
12.0 weeks
16.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2013
6.6 weeks
14.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2014
Motivation:
Good process. Efficient and clear.
7.6 weeks
7.9 weeks
n/a
4 reports
Accepted
2011
Motivation:
Very quick but thorough review process
Many reviewers (5 in our case), who's comments can improve the paper
Many reviewers (5 in our case), who's comments can improve the paper