Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
22.0 weeks
38.9 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2015
Motivation:
The review process was quite drawn out and protracted because only one of the three original reviewers responded to the revised submission, meaning a fourth (new) reviewer had to be found. The Journal apologised for this delay and handled the matter professionally as possible considering the circumstances.