Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
7.1 weeks
7.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2024
Motivation:
The journal has improved response time significantly - now in par with what one would expect - even recieved proofs same day as acceptance
6.4 weeks
7.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2024
Motivation:
Compared to previous experience the journal has improved its review time
13.3 weeks
21.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2023
Motivation:
The first review rounds took a long time though it improved the paper substantially.
10.7 weeks
14.4 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2021
14.4 weeks
15.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2021
Motivation:
The review process was delayed due to non-reponse from one of the reviewers but the editors were apologetic about it and were prompt to respond to follow-up emails and finding a solution. Otherwise the review process improved the paper and the acception on resubmission was very quick.
8.3 weeks
12.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2020
9.6 weeks
14.4 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Rejected
2020
7.1 weeks
7.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2019
9.1 weeks
15.1 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2017
Motivation:
The first round of reviews was good and greatly improved the paper. The second round of reviews was also helpful. After an initial long wait for the first decision the process got a lot speedier. However, I felt that one reviewer and one of the editors were asking me to re-frame results in a way that was not supported by evidence, which took a number of minor revisions and rebuttal letters to agree on.
32.7 weeks
33.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2017
Motivation:
The review process took too long because the journal could not find adequate reviewers. The reviewer comments were helpful but it appeared that they were not specialist reviewers either. The decision following re submission was very fast.
14.4 weeks
14.4 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Rejected
2016
Motivation:
The reviewers' remarks were easy to address. When we asked the editor to reconsider, she stated the one of variable represents oversimplification of the issue. It was something we could not change by re-writing. This type of concerns should make the editor to reject the paper from the start and not to make us wait for 4 month.
17.0 weeks
17.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2014
11.3 weeks
11.3 weeks
n/a
4 reports
Rejected
2014