Reviews for "Chiang Mai Journal of Science"

Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
4.0 weeks
6.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
4
Accepted
2015
Motivation: Chiang Mai Journal of Science has a good reviewing system. However, they take a long time in online publishing of their papers.