Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
4.1 weeks
11.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2025
3.9 weeks
7.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2026
Motivation:
The procedures and required timeline were reasonable. Overall, the reviewers provided clear and specific points for improvement, and the editor allocated a 2 month revision period commensurate with the difficulty of the major revision.
n/a
n/a
2 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2023
7.0 weeks
7.0 weeks
n/a
4 reports
Rejected
2021
Motivation:
Editorial rejection after 7 weeks and 4 reviewers. 3 reviewers evaluated the paper positively, only one recommended rejection without any constructive comment. After an appeal (and sending the manuscript in its revised form addressing the 3 reviewers' comments), the paper got ultimately rejected after several days by the EIC. Sad story.
3.3 weeks
9.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2020
Motivation:
I found reviewers' comments logical to be addressed before publishing it to ACS Chemistry of Materials.
n/a
n/a
10 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2020
n/a
n/a
8 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2018
11.7 weeks
24.1 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2017
n/a
n/a
14 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2016