Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
n/a
n/a
16 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2025
Motivation:
The manuscript languished with the journal for 2 weeks, oscillating from "submitted" to "with Editor" to "submitted" to "with Editor". Finally, an email arrived with a desk rejection, offering ZERO insight into the reason for the rejection. This experience does not provide any confidence that the work was given reasonable consideration or that the authors' efforts in executing and interpreting some complex data were actually read or considered. Very poor experience with professional editors in this journal.
4.6 weeks
6.6 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2023
Motivation:
The peer review process was smooth and quick