Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
16.1 weeks
16.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
2016
Motivation: CEJPP was very professional in this handling my manuscript. The editor-in-chief even emailed me to notify me that the second reviewer had not delivered their report on time. The journal appointed a reviewer immediately and the entire process was very expedient.
4.7 weeks
7.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
2016
Motivation: In overall it was quite good collaboration. The communication between author and editor was on time, no delays in answers. The reviews were helpful and constructive. The manuscript submission system was very helpful in order to provide the account for the funding institution.