Reviews for "Cell Metabolism"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Cell Metabolism 9.6
weeks
9.6
weeks
n/a 3 3
(good)
2
(moderate)
Rejected
Motivation: In fact, the reviewers´ comments could have been addressed in a reasonable manner and time frame, yet the paper was rejected. Hence, it was not clear to us why, if the revisions were reasonable, we were not given the opportunity to respond. However, communication with the Editorial team was fluent and overall good experience.
Cell Metabolism n/a n/a 7.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Motivation: The current work seems to fall somewhat short of the broad advance beyond the published literature to be a strong candidate for the journal.
Cell Metabolism n/a n/a 42.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Cell Metabolism n/a n/a 7.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Cell Metabolism n/a n/a 34.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Motivation: Terribly long for an immediate rejection, we lost our time.
We wonder if we were in competition with one of the editor who is working in the same field. He wasn't the handling editor of the paper but we wouldn't be surprised if the paper was send to him for internal review, this would explain the immediate rejection after such a long time.