Reviews for "Cell Metabolism"

Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
9.6 weeks
9.6 weeks
n/a
3 reports
3
2
Rejected
2020
Motivation: In fact, the reviewers´ comments could have been addressed in a reasonable manner and time frame, yet the paper was rejected. Hence, it was not clear to us why, if the revisions were reasonable, we were not given the opportunity to respond. However, communication with the Editorial team was fluent and overall good experience.
n/a
n/a
7 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2019
Motivation: The current work seems to fall somewhat short of the broad advance beyond the published literature to be a strong candidate for the journal.
n/a
n/a
42 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2019
n/a
n/a
7 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2018
n/a
n/a
34 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2017
Motivation: Terribly long for an immediate rejection, we lost our time.
We wonder if we were in competition with one of the editor who is working in the same field. He wasn't the handling editor of the paper but we wouldn't be surprised if the paper was send to him for internal review, this would explain the immediate rejection after such a long time.