Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
15.2 weeks
20.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2017
4.0 weeks
7.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2016
Motivation:
No issues with the way the manuscript was handled by the editor, everything happened in a reasonable timeframe. The quality of the reviews was disappointing though, ranging from questions that do not make sense to asking for in vivo experiments that take >1year to do. A thorough rebuttal letter seems to have worked though.
6.6 weeks
7.7 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Accepted
2015
Motivation:
Fast enough, constructive comments.