Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
2.3 weeks
3.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2019
6.0 weeks
10.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2013
Motivation:
The editors and editorial staff was responsive and relatively prompt. There were a few delays in review due to the fact that it was submitted just before holiday season and probably because one of the reviewers took longer than expected.
3.0 weeks
6.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2014
Motivation:
The comments by the reviewers were constructive and resulted in a better paper at the end. All their concern were well founded. What is most important is that the manuscript was not rejected straight away, and allowed the resubmission of the corrected manuscript.
The Editor was also very professional and supportive.
The Editor was also very professional and supportive.