Follow @scirev on Twitter
Reviews for "Cardiovascular Research"
| Journal title | Average duration | Review reports (1st review rnd.) |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (click to go to journal page) | 1st rev. rnd | Tot. handling | Im. rejection | Number | Quality | Overall rating | Outcome |
| Cardiovascular Research | 4.0 weeks |
8.0 weeks |
n/a | 3 | 1 (bad) |
0 (very bad) |
Rejected |
| Motivation: We responded to EVERY comment made by the reviewers with new data. One of the reviewers made a serious error in their review of the manuscript and new data; they did not read it. I appealed to the editor to examine it. The editor make me wait two additional weeks, then told me "they do not overturn reviewers decisions". I asked the editor if she read the reviewer's comments. I never got a response. | |||||||