Reviews for "Cancer Research"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Cancer Research 5.0
weeks
8.4
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Cancer Research 5.4
weeks
5.4
weeks
n/a 2 2
(moderate)
2
(moderate)
Rejected
Cancer Research 13.0
weeks
56.4
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Motivation: The review process eventually helped to improve the quality of the paper, but not all comments were necessarily benign and constructive.
Cancer Research 4.6
weeks
4.6
weeks
n/a 3 0
(very bad)
0
(very bad)
Rejected
Motivation: There was one review very poorly written and most comments could not be understood. It seems like a review written by a postdoc instead of a principal investigator who should be (or was) asked to do perform review. Senior Editor showed no interest for scientific discussion.
Cancer Research 9.0
weeks
9.0
weeks
n/a 2 2
(moderate)
1
(bad)
Rejected