Reviews for "Cancer Research"

Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome Year
n/a n/a 5.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2022
5.0
weeks
8.4
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted 2016
5.4
weeks
5.4
weeks
n/a 2 2
(moderate)
2
(moderate)
Rejected 2017
13.0
weeks
56.4
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted 2013
Motivation: The review process eventually helped to improve the quality of the paper, but not all comments were necessarily benign and constructive.
4.6
weeks
4.6
weeks
n/a 3 0
(very bad)
0
(very bad)
Rejected 2014
Motivation: There was one review very poorly written and most comments could not be understood. It seems like a review written by a postdoc instead of a principal investigator who should be (or was) asked to do perform review. Senior Editor showed no interest for scientific discussion.
9.0
weeks
9.0
weeks
n/a 2 2
(moderate)
1
(bad)
Rejected 2012