Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
18.3 weeks
19.9 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2017
Motivation:
The first round of review took a long time as the reviews sat with the editors for months before we received them. This is probably because of the length of the reviewers' comments, which was 8 pages. It was frustrating knowing the reviews were back and not hearing anything, however on the positive side the editorial staff were very helpful throughout the process.
4.4 weeks
5.1 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Accepted
2016
n/a
n/a
1 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2016