Reviews for "Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 16.1
n/a 2 4
(very good)
Motivation: After acceptance of the paper, a new comment by the editor, raising points that never emerged before in the reviewing process - and not very coherent with the content of the paper -, was sent to us. After that, we did not receive any further modification of the status of our paper, nor any suggestion on the process we should follow the change the manuscript. After two months we decided to write to the managing editor proposing some changes coherently with the editor suggestions.
Overall, the editorial process was poorly handled.