Reviews for "Building and Environment"

Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome Year
n/a n/a 3.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2021
Motivation: Very fast response by the editor
6.0
weeks
6.3
weeks
n/a 2 3
(good)
2
(moderate)
Accepted 2020
Motivation: Reviewer were constructive. Editor suggested to add recent papers from the journal.
n/a n/a 1.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2020
16.0
weeks
20.6
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
3
(good)
Accepted 2018
Motivation: The funny part is that me and one of my co-authors received an invitation to review the article! We did not accept it and mentioned it to the editor in chief without any answer from his part. However, the reviewers' remarks were constructive and important to improve the manuscript.
9.9
weeks
9.9
weeks
n/a 2 0
(very bad)
0
(very bad)
Rejected 2018
4.7
weeks
4.9
weeks
n/a 3 4
(very good)
5
(excellent)
Accepted 2017
Motivation: The review process was seriously and fast handled by the editor. One reviewer provided a careful revision of the manuscript with a lot of constructive remarks that improved the manuscript.