Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
n/a
n/a
3 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2021
Motivation:
Very fast response by the editor
6.0 weeks
6.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2020
Motivation:
Reviewer were constructive. Editor suggested to add recent papers from the journal.
n/a
n/a
1 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2020
16.0 weeks
20.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2018
Motivation:
The funny part is that me and one of my co-authors received an invitation to review the article! We did not accept it and mentioned it to the editor in chief without any answer from his part. However, the reviewers' remarks were constructive and important to improve the manuscript.
9.9 weeks
9.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2018
4.7 weeks
4.9 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2017
Motivation:
The review process was seriously and fast handled by the editor. One reviewer provided a careful revision of the manuscript with a lot of constructive remarks that improved the manuscript.