Reviews for "British Journal of Sports Medicine"

Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
n/a
n/a
25 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2017
Motivation: In my view, the journals should not make recommendations to other journals, especially when the suggestion is related to an alternative and lucrative marketplace of Open Acess "sister" journals that require substantial amounts of processing charges.
6.7 weeks
16.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
2018
Motivation: The quality of the review for this manuscript was of a high quality with the reviewer even going to the detail of matching protocol procedures to the final manuscripts methods to ensure the quality of the submission was high.
n/a
n/a
4 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2017
Motivation: While the manuscript was rejected the decision was quick.
n/a
n/a
11 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2017
Motivation: While the manuscript was rejected without external review the process was very timely and I would recommend publication within the BJSM.