Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
10.6 weeks
10.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2021
Motivation:
The review process was fast, but the quality of the reviews was extremely poor. The points raised by one of the reviewers were arbitrary, as if the manuscript were not read in detail. Said reviewer asked for information that was already included in the manuscript. Very disappointing.
n/a
n/a
12 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2020
Motivation:
I found the review process very fast and adequate.
n/a
n/a
7 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2018
Motivation:
The editor sent a very personalized and encouraging commentary, and recommended alternative specialist outlets which might be more appropriate for the paper.
8.9 weeks
8.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Drawn back
2015
Motivation:
Magnificent work of the Action Editor and reviewers. Their comments were very helpful and insightful, but also required much of work to be done.