Reviews for "British Journal of General Practice"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome Year
British Journal of General Practice Immediately accepted after 0.4 weeks Accepted (im.) 2018
Motivation: extraordinarily quick decision compared to other journal, or indeed this journal under previuos editors
British Journal of General Practice 9.7
weeks
10.0
weeks
n/a 3 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted 2018
Motivation: This is the 4th paper that i have submitted (and had 3 accepted) by the BJGP.

As always, the process was rigorous, but fair. Because of the complex statistics in this paper, it was sent out to a 3rd reviewer, a statistician. The comments from all 3 reviewers were very constructive. I made considerable efforts to address these fully, and the end result was a much improved paper. The editor was extremely supportive throughout, dealing promptly and helpfully with a query whilst I was preparing the revised manuscript.

The journal's website with guidance for authors is detailed and clear.

The quality of the submission process for this journal is outstanding, compared to other journals I have used. I would commend the BJGP to authors with suitable manuscripts.
British Journal of General Practice 4.3
weeks
4.5
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
5
(excellent)
Accepted 2017
British Journal of General Practice 3.9
weeks
4.4
weeks
n/a 2 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted 2017
Motivation: Rapid handling, excellent reviewers who had constructive suggestions, leading to a thorough revision of the manuscript
British Journal of General Practice 4.3
weeks
4.3
weeks
n/a 2 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted 2018
Motivation: Really thoughtful and sensible comments from Editor and peer reviewers - excellent process all round.
British Journal of General Practice Immediately accepted after 0.6 weeks Accepted (im.) 2018
Motivation: very rapid and helful process
British Journal of General Practice 4.4
weeks
4.9
weeks
n/a 2 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted 2018
Motivation: Excellent turnaround time, high quality reviews and detailed feedback on the stage of your paper within the cycle.
British Journal of General Practice Immediately accepted after 0.4 weeks Accepted (im.) 2017
Motivation: I always receive a rapid, polite response with useful feedback.
British Journal of General Practice 12.4
weeks
12.7
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
5
(excellent)
Accepted 2017
Motivation: The reviewer's comments were very thoughtful. It was hard to see what the journal could have done better in terms of making the process simple to follow. The turnaround times were good and the editorial team responsive.
British Journal of General Practice 7.0
weeks
7.3
weeks
n/a 2 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted 2017
British Journal of General Practice 7.0
weeks
7.9
weeks
n/a 3 5
(excellent)
4
(very good)
Accepted 2017
Motivation: I found the majority of the reviewer's comments constructive and relevant. All authors found the manuscript improved after the peer-review proces. The time from submission to assignment of reviewer was acceptable and the time from submission of revised manuscrip to acceptance was swift.
British Journal of General Practice 2.1
weeks
2.4
weeks
n/a 1 4
(very good)
5
(excellent)
Accepted 2017
Motivation: A very good review process. Clear and timely feedback.
British Journal of General Practice 3.0
weeks
3.0
weeks
n/a 2 3
(good)
4
(very good)
Accepted 2015