Reviews for "British Journal of General Practice"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
British Journal of General Practice 4.4
weeks
4.9
weeks
n/a 2 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Motivation: Excellent turnaround time, high quality reviews and detailed feedback on the stage of your paper within the cycle.
British Journal of General Practice Immediately accepted after 0.4 weeks Accepted (im.)
Motivation: I always receive a rapid, polite response with useful feedback.
British Journal of General Practice 12.4
weeks
12.7
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Motivation: The reviewer's comments were very thoughtful. It was hard to see what the journal could have done better in terms of making the process simple to follow. The turnaround times were good and the editorial team responsive.
British Journal of General Practice 7.0
weeks
7.3
weeks
n/a 2 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
British Journal of General Practice 7.0
weeks
7.9
weeks
n/a 3 5
(excellent)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Motivation: I found the majority of the reviewer's comments constructive and relevant. All authors found the manuscript improved after the peer-review proces. The time from submission to assignment of reviewer was acceptable and the time from submission of revised manuscrip to acceptance was swift.
British Journal of General Practice 2.1
weeks
2.4
weeks
n/a 1 4
(very good)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Motivation: A very good review process. Clear and timely feedback.
British Journal of General Practice 3.0
weeks
3.0
weeks
n/a 2 3
(good)
4
(very good)
Accepted