Reviews for "British Food Journal"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
British Food Journal 11.6
weeks
11.6
weeks
n/a 2 2
(moderate)
3
(good)
Rejected
Motivation: Of the two reviews, one would be solid and useful and the suggestion was to make major changes. Another reviewer rejected the paper and did not give a single comment, only writing "unsatisfactory". Such a review can be done by anyone, which I believe significantly reduces the reputation of the journal. Waiting time for reviews was within acceptable.
British Food Journal 9.1
weeks
9.3
weeks
n/a 2 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Motivation: Fast and straightforward process. The reviewers had many insightful suggestions that really improved the paper.