Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
2.0 weeks
3.0 weeks
n/a
1 reports
5
5
Accepted
2015
1.0 weeks
1.0 weeks
n/a
1 reports
5
4
Accepted
2014
Motivation: Everything was fine, fast, and convenient (the editorial office would copy edit our manuscript so I was not required to send a revised version), but when we received the proofs we discovered that substantial changes had been performed on our manuscript, is some cases changing completely the meaning of what we were stating. We had to correct all passages. It would be better to let us to prepare the revised version.