Reviews for "BMC Plant Biology"
Journal title | Average duration | Review reports (1st review rnd.) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(click to go to journal page) | 1st rev. rnd | Tot. handling | Im. rejection | Number | Quality | Overall rating | Outcome |
BMC Plant Biology | 17.7 weeks |
45.4 weeks |
n/a | 5 | 4 (very good) |
1 (bad) |
Accepted |
Motivation: The process was very long and communication was limited. Although the time to the first revision was still acceptable, and revisions were helpful and important, the time it took after that was not reasonable. | |||||||
BMC Plant Biology | 15.1 weeks |
28.4 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 3 (good) |
2 (moderate) |
Accepted |
BMC Plant Biology | 6.6 weeks |
6.6 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 0 (very bad) |
1 (bad) |
Rejected |
Motivation: The paper was rejected due to Editor“s verdict. One of the referees suggested acceptance of the manuscript while the other suggested rejection. The editor decided to take in account the second referee. |