Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
12.0 weeks
15.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
3
Accepted
2019
Motivation: Manuscript was submitted for a month before editor came back with questions. We addressed them and resubmitted, then it went out for review, the review process took about a month and a half. The reviewer comments were easy to address and the manuscript was resubmitted quickly. The manuscript was then accepted pending minor revisions requested by the editor, which were addressed the same day. The manuscript was officially accepted days later. The whole process took less than 4 months.
12.1 weeks
18.3 weeks
n/a
1 reports
5
3
Accepted
2012
Motivation: A revision making by external reviewers helps to improve greatly your manuscript. What happens is that sometimes it is a long and cumbersome process because like happened to me, my manuscript was sent to 2 reviewers, which I answered all of their requirements. Later, they sent the manuscript to a third reviewer that made me more requirements. I.e., when I thought the process was over, it began again. The manuscript improved a lot, but it took a very long time.