Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
25.6 weeks
33.1 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2020
Motivation:
Good peer review and easy handling and communication by the editors. Quick publication after the point of acceptance. Seemed to take a long time before the first round of peer review was received.
6.3 weeks
12.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Drawn back
2020
Motivation:
The manuscript engages reviewers who are not remotely associated with the field or the specialization, which makes it impossible to address the reviews. We withdrew our manuscript as the questions from the editor and reviewers were complete waste of our time. The journal does not reply to questions. I would strongly advise against submitting to BMC ID.
13.0 weeks
13.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2013
Motivation:
The review process was too long. The journal did not respond my emails when I asked for an update of the manuscript status.