Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
6.0 weeks
8.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
2013
Motivation: Knowledgeable reviewers responding with constructive criticism which improved the manuscript. Fairly swift review process.
4.3 weeks
8.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
2
Accepted
2013
Motivation: The review process was good in the statistical analysis of the results