Reviews for "BMC Cancer"
Journal title | Average duration | Review reports (1st review rnd.) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(click to go to journal page) | 1st rev. rnd | Tot. handling | Im. rejection | Number | Quality | Overall rating | Outcome |
BMC Cancer | n/a | n/a | 6.0 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) |
BMC Cancer | 12.0 weeks |
12.0 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 1 (bad) |
1 (bad) |
Rejected |
Motivation: Despite one positive and one negative review, the editor did not provide us with an opportunity to respond to the latter. | |||||||
BMC Cancer | 32.1 weeks |
32.1 weeks |
n/a | 1 | 3 (good) |
1 (bad) |
Rejected |
Motivation: Communication was extremely poor. After numerous emails approximately 5 months after submission, the journal finally responded to say they were looking for a second reviewer. The editor was very unresponsive, and did not offer the authors the option of suggesting further reviewers. | |||||||
BMC Cancer | 17.3 weeks |
24.1 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 4 (very good) |
4 (very good) |
Accepted |