Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
11.4 weeks
20.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
1
1
Accepted
2015
Motivation: I felt like there were very long lag times between submission of the manuscript (initially and revised) and any communication from the journal. I wondered if perhaps the editorial board and referees were not familiar with my area of research, as the reviews were not particularly helpful, and the whole process took a very long time. It also seemed like the editor was changed between the initial submission and the revised submission of the manuscript.