Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
3.9 weeks
3.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2021
Motivation:
Had a nice review process with Blood. Smooth submission and relatively fast turnaround seeing as it was sent to two external reviewers. While a rejection is fine, some of the issues they found were actually addressed in the paper & stemmed from the reviewers simply skimming the paper. A bit frustrating but understandable given high impact journals are certainly swamped with submissions. I would have preferred a longer wait to allow the reviewers time to actually thoroughly read and understand the article.
0.0 weeks
0.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Rejected
2017
Motivation:
It was quite fast process.
Moreover, 2 out of 3 review's comments are exceptionally valuable to improve my future research.
Moreover, 2 out of 3 review's comments are exceptionally valuable to improve my future research.
n/a
n/a
4 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2015
3.0 weeks
3.0 weeks
n/a
0 reports
n/a
Rejected
2011
n/a
n/a
1 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2012