Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Blood 3.9
weeks
3.9
weeks
n/a 2 1
(bad)
3
(good)
Rejected
Motivation: Had a nice review process with Blood. Smooth submission and relatively fast turnaround seeing as it was sent to two external reviewers. While a rejection is fine, some of the issues they found were actually addressed in the paper & stemmed from the reviewers simply skimming the paper. A bit frustrating but understandable given high impact journals are certainly swamped with submissions. I would have preferred a longer wait to allow the reviewers time to actually thoroughly read and understand the article.
Blood 0.0
weeks
0.0
weeks
n/a 3 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Rejected
Motivation: It was quite fast process.
Moreover, 2 out of 3 review's comments are exceptionally valuable to improve my future research.
Blood n/a n/a 4.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Blood 3.0
weeks
3.0
weeks
n/a 0 n/a 2
(moderate)
Rejected
Blood n/a n/a 1.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)