Reviews for "Bioresource Technology"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Bioresource Technology n/a n/a 7.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Motivation: Editor has refused the article without any good reason and I had the feeling that he does not even read the manuscript, given the automatic, vague and obtuse answer.
Bioresource Technology 6.0
weeks
6.4
weeks
n/a 3 5
(excellent)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Motivation: The review process was very fast. Reviewers comments was useful. Totally ol review process looks very well.
Bioresource Technology 5.0
weeks
5.0
weeks
n/a 2 0
(very bad)
3
(good)
Rejected
Motivation: The duration of the review, reviewers selectopn and editorial decision was short. The responce of one of the reviewers was strongly incompetent.