Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
4.9 weeks
6.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
2
3
Accepted
2024
Motivation: Handling and communication concerning the manuscript were quick. However, some of the reviewer reports were unusual. The first reviewer had valuable inputs, however, at times requested additional work that would have gone far beyond the scope of the presented manuscript or which was simply not applicable/feasible for the investigated specimen. However, the second reviewer did not really seem to care about the work, as their suggestions were more of a general nature (extend discussion without specific inputs, add highlights, add a graphical abstract).
2.9 weeks
3.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
5
Accepted
2021
Motivation: I am writing to express my satisfaction with the review process of Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy. The journal's editors and reviewers were prompt and thorough in their handling of my manuscript, and their feedback was helpful and constructive. I appreciate the time and effort that they put into ensuring that the quality of the journal is maintained.
The review process was timely and efficient.
Overall, I had a positive experience with the review process of Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy. I would highly recommend this journal to other researchers.
n/a
n/a
49 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2014
Motivation: Seven weeks is very long time for making a decision on the manuscript which is not fit for the journal by an editorial board without being sent to external review.
3.0 weeks
3.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
2016
Motivation: Very much satisfactory.