Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
18.3 weeks
18.3 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Rejected
2024
Motivation:
The editor took several weeks on their part and then did not write any comments of their own. The reviews were short, but reasonable. Even with a positive, neutral, and somewhat negative review, the submission was rejected without comment.
3.9 weeks
6.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2020
Motivation:
Efficient review process, with helpful reviewers' comments.
6.3 weeks
10.7 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2017
Motivation:
It's ok for me, but for my friend they took 7 months for the 1st review & took 4 months to send it to reviewers.
9.4 weeks
14.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2017
Motivation:
Reasonably good reviewing and management times. Reviewers comments were of good quality and contributed to improve the final version of the work.
8.9 weeks
9.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2016
Motivation:
Quick and fair review
30.4 weeks
36.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2015