Reviews for "Biomaterials"

Journal title	Average duration			Review reports (1^st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page)	1^st rev. rnd	Tot. handling	Im. rejection	Number	Quality	Overall rating	Outcome
Biomaterials	n/a	n/a	15.0 days	n/a	n/a	n/a	Rejected (im.)
Biomaterials	Motivation: The time taken to arrive at a rejection by the editor was inappropriately long (2 weeks).
Biomaterials	n/a	n/a	9.0 days	n/a	n/a	n/a	Rejected (im.)
Biomaterials	13.0 weeks	13.0 weeks	n/a	4	4 (very good)	4 (very good)	Rejected
Biomaterials	Motivation: Reviewer comments were pertinent, well-documented and demonstrated good knowledge of the field.
Biomaterials	n/a	n/a	5.0 days	n/a	n/a	n/a	Rejected (im.)
Biomaterials	Motivation: I think the decision was a bit too drastic. Perhaps a proper review process would have help to improve the manuscript and its content. The positive point is that the decision took only a few days.
Biomaterials	4.0 weeks	5.0 weeks	n/a	1	3 (good)	4 (very good)	Accepted