Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
n/a
n/a
26 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2020
Motivation:
Unfortunately, the longest part of the whole process was the manuscript not being assigned a manuscript number for three weeks. We had to chase up the editorial office for the manuscript to be assigned a number.
n/a
n/a
46 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2019
Motivation:
Took 1.5 months for a direct rejection. Sad. Journal says 2018 review time was 3-4 weeks. Laughable
n/a
n/a
15 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2018
Motivation:
The time taken to arrive at a rejection by the editor was inappropriately long (2 weeks).
n/a
n/a
9 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2018
13.0 weeks
13.0 weeks
n/a
4 reports
Rejected
2016
Motivation:
Reviewer comments were pertinent, well-documented and demonstrated good knowledge of the field.
n/a
n/a
5 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2015
Motivation:
I think the decision was a bit too drastic. Perhaps a proper review process would have help to improve the manuscript and its content. The positive point is that the decision took only a few days.
4.0 weeks
5.0 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Accepted
2014