Reviews for "Biological Reviews"
| Journal title | Average duration | Review reports (1st review rnd.) |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (click to go to journal page) | 1st rev. rnd | Tot. handling | Im. rejection | Number | Quality | Overall rating | Outcome |
| Biological Reviews | 15.4 weeks |
27.3 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 3 (good) |
1 (bad) |
Accepted |
| Motivation: The quality of only one of the two review reports was helpful. More importantly, it took the very long ( several months) to send back the review reports, and the reference and layout needed to be changed several times before we reached the final acceptance. | |||||||
| Biological Reviews | 10.9 weeks |
27.7 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 5 (excellent) |
4 (very good) |
Accepted |