Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
14.0 weeks
31.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2022
Motivation:
The entire process took a long time and we appreciated the in-depth reviews that helped improve the manuscript. In the end, the manuscript was rejected in part due to points that were raised in the first review round. The raised points were valid criticism but we would have preferred a rejection on these points earlier in the process.
15.3 weeks
21.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2019
Motivation:
The entire process in this journal takes very long although they are also very generous with the time given to the authors for revising the manuscript. The quality of the reviews was good and the handling editor additionally helped us with their statements (especially concerning contradictory reviewer statements).
15.1 weeks
18.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2022
Motivation:
The first round took a little longer than expected, and the few comments of the two reviewer were constructive but rather superficial. The time between resubmission and decision was quite short.
13.6 weeks
18.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2017
12.9 weeks
21.1 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2017
Motivation:
I felt the process was smooth and reasonably fast. I never felt like the waiting periods were excessive, and and in general the comments were relevant and constructive. Editors responded to queries quickly and were accommodating regarding timelines for returning revisions.
n/a
n/a
14 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2015