Reviews for "Biological Control"

Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome Year
69.4
weeks
69.4
weeks
n/a 1 2
(moderate)
1
(bad)
Rejected 2016
Motivation: 16 months for review is unacceptable. I waited patiently until the 5th month and only received excuses about the length of the review process. I asked to withdraw my paper after 12 months, and the editorial staff could not complete this request properly.

The quality of the review was fine, and the article was eventually published elsehwere.
n/a n/a 8.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2017
Motivation: Complaining about ms being a case study of single species.
11.6
weeks
11.6
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted 2015