Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
69.4 weeks
69.4 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Rejected
2016
Motivation:
16 months for review is unacceptable. I waited patiently until the 5th month and only received excuses about the length of the review process. I asked to withdraw my paper after 12 months, and the editorial staff could not complete this request properly.
The quality of the review was fine, and the article was eventually published elsehwere.
The quality of the review was fine, and the article was eventually published elsehwere.
n/a
n/a
8 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2017
Motivation:
Complaining about ms being a case study of single species.
11.6 weeks
11.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2015