Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
2.6 weeks
4.6 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2023
Motivation:
The journal's processing times were fast. The reviewers were anonymous but from the review they appeared to be individuals who were well suited for reviewing. We submitted a web resource. The reviewers provided constructive feedback on several aspects of the resource and in the process of addressing all comments - our resource became considerably better.
3.0 weeks
3.3 weeks
n/a
4 reports
Accepted
2023
Motivation:
The journal article was transferred from Bioinformatics (upon rejection after revision by 3 reviewers). Then,a fter 20 days I got the decision to resubmit a revised version of the paper with an additional reviewer report (4 in total). The revisions were affordable but time consuming, but improved a lot the work.
After 3 weeks we resubmitted the revised version of the article and it has been accepted directly by the associated editor within 2 days.
After 3 weeks we resubmitted the revised version of the article and it has been accepted directly by the associated editor within 2 days.