Reviews for "Biodiversity and Conservation"

Journal title	Average duration			Review reports (1^st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page)	1^st rev. rnd	Tot. handling	Im. rejection	Number	Quality	Overall rating	Outcome
Biodiversity and Conservation	10.0 weeks	13.0 weeks	n/a	2	4 (very good)	4 (very good)	Accepted
Biodiversity and Conservation	n/a	n/a	39.0 days	n/a	n/a	n/a	Rejected (im.)
Biodiversity and Conservation	n/a	n/a	14.0 days	n/a	n/a	n/a	Rejected (im.)
Biodiversity and Conservation	Motivation: Study journal contents before submission
Biodiversity and Conservation	n/a	n/a	13.0 days	n/a	n/a	n/a	Rejected (im.)
Biodiversity and Conservation	Motivation: The editor in chief informed me that he turns down ~70% of submissions without peer review (after he reads them), and that my paper was not a tight enough fit for their primary audience of biodiversity scientists. I hoped it could work based on a few other papers similar to me published in the journal, but of course I respect the prerogative of the editor and appreciated the fast rejection.