Reviews for "BioData Mining"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
BioData Mining 11.4
weeks
21.1
weeks
n/a 3 1
(bad)
1
(bad)
Rejected
Motivation: We received mediocre reports from the reviewers and addressed all their points.
One of the reviewer was extremely ignorant on the topic and did not understand our replies, and recommend the article for rejection. The editor then decided to reject our article.
BioData Mining 22.9
weeks
22.9
weeks
n/a 3 4
(very good)
2
(moderate)
Rejected
Motivation: After a very long wait, we had a rejection with short reviews.
BioData Mining 14.4
weeks
14.4
weeks
n/a 1 3
(good)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Motivation: A good review process
BioData Mining 5.7
weeks
5.7
weeks
n/a 2 3
(good)
3
(good)
Rejected
Motivation: Fast process with good reviews, even if the article was rejected.
BioData Mining 13.4
weeks
19.0
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Motivation: Very good review system and very interesting reports from the reviewers. The editor also made some requests with which we did not agree; we explained our reasons and he was okay with them. A good experience.