Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
6.9 weeks
6.9 weeks
n/a
1 reports
4
4
Accepted
2017
Motivation: The review process didn't take long time and I found it helpful that the editor shared with me the reviewer's report in its entirety. The reviewer had some helpful suggestions (some not) and caught some errors. The copy-editing seemed of very basic kind (if any).