Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
21.6 weeks
42.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
2
Rejected
2021
Motivation: The first decision was to make major changes. According to the author, one reviewer is not too competent for certain concepts for which he asked questions, and despite the explanation by the author, he did not understand the concept. After revising the paper according to the reviewers' suggestions, one reviewer proposed major changes again while another reviewer rejected the paper. The editor decided to reject the paper. The reviews did not help to improve the quality of the manuscript.
7.3 weeks
7.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
3
Rejected
2019
Motivation: One reviewer has given reasonable comments (and ask for "reject and resubmit), but another one offered fairly subjective opinion based on his attitude towards qualitative research (and reject the paper).