Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
9.3 weeks
15.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
4
Accepted
2020
Motivation: The reviewers' comments were extensive and well-argued, and for the most part contributed to improving the quality of the text. My overall impression is that the peer-review process was fast.